Earlier this year I spoke to a
university class. I asked the 20 or so people in the room where they got their
news.
Newspapers? (Online or in print.) Two or
three.
Radio? A couple.
TV news? One brave soul put up her hand.
So if they didn’t get their news from
traditional media outlets, where did they get it from?
Facebook, they replied.
My tiny poll confirmed what research is
increasingly finding out on a wider scale: When it comes to news, many people
learn about the world from social media.
According to the Pew Research Center,
one in three Americans get their news through Facebook today.
This is why some of the largest media
outlets in the U.S., such as the New York Times, recently struck an agreement
with Facebook to host its news on that site.
Of course, people aren’t going to
Facebook for news; they find it there while looking for something else.
"People go to Facebook to share
personal moments — and they discover the news almost incidentally," says
Amy Mitchell, director of journalism research at Pew.
And how do they do that?
The same way we all do: A friend posts a
link and says: “Check this out!”
This is more than just a shift in the
source of information. It also represents a profound shift in thinking.
Among
the first to notice this was Jane Buckingham of Intelligence Group, a market research company.
As reported by the New YorkTimes in 2008, Buckingham recalled conducting a focus group on where people got their news.
A college student said: “If the news is that important, it will
find me.”
Let that sink in a moment: If news is
important, it will find me.
For the mainstream media, or for any
non-profit group trying to share its messages, this is represents a reversal of
how news dissemination has worked for a very long time.
Previously, people depended on experts to help them make sense of
the world—to select the stories they thought people should see.
It was what’s known as a “push” strategy. A few individuals at the
centre push information out to consumers.
Today we live in a “pull” world. People look for the information
they want and discard the rest.
Of course, it was probably always this way; few people read
everything an editor put into a magazine or newspaper.
But social media changes things dramatically. Instead of a few
sources of information about the world, people have access to a multitude—including
their friends.
Increasingly, that is the new filter being applied when deciding
what to consider.
So instead of subscribing to a newspaper or newsletter, or
watching a newscast, people check their Facebook feed to see what’s coming
their way.
Their friends are the new editors, in other words, and they do the
same for the people they know.
Again, it was always this way, whether around the campfire, the
church foyer or talking over the backyard fence. Social media changes the
scale.
For non-profit groups, this means using people (donors) to amplify
and pass along their messages—being part of the social media conversation.
We can contribute to the conversation, and
try to shape it, but in the end it’s what the audience decides is important
that will get shared, and which others will finally see.
Because when it comes to making the news
these days, many people don’t go looking for it. They wait for it to find them.
Infographic at top from Daniel Zeevi.
No comments:
Post a Comment