Internal memos from two major North American media outlets
have put a spotlight on how journalists are viewing the future.
The first, from the Boston Globe, shows how newspapers are trying to leave the world of print
behind.
In the memo, editor Brian McGrory tells staff that it is
time for the Globe to “once and for all break the stubborn rhythms of a print
operation, allowing us to unabashedly pursue digital subscriptions.”
As reported by Joseph Lichterman for Nieman Lab, McGrory goes on to say that the Globe needs to publish stories earlier in the day, restructure beats, create new audience engagement no longer see print as the dominant driver of workflows.
“None of the changes detailed here will come as any surprise, though in total, they represent significant change,” McGrory wrote.
The Globe is not alone; over the past two years, newspapers
such as The Dallas Morning News, the Miami Herald, and the Minneapolis Star
Tribune have all enacted similar initiatives.
The other major media outlet to share
its vision of the future in a memo to staff was the CBC in Canada.
Although the CBC is not beholden to print timelines, it has
been bound to the idea of supper hour and 10 p.m. newscasts in the past.
No more. In a memo to staff, General Manager and Editor in
Chief Jennifer McGuire wrote that, in the future, the CBC will be driven by
digital.
Digital news, she said, “needs to be a part of everything we
do, not a stand-alone pillar of our news service.”
To make this possible, the CBC needs to make sure that all
its journalists have more opportunities to be connected to its digital news
operations.
The CBC also needs to “redirect resources to create more
original and investigative journalism and to better serve audiences on emerging
platforms” and The National, its flagship news program, needs to “inextricably
linked to the reinvention of our news service. “
One of the key figures in the changes is Brodie Fenlon, senior director of digital at the CBC. I posted
about his vision for the future earlier on my blog.
For both media outlets, the story is still the most
important thing, regardless of what platform it is on. And they want to honour
those who still value print and traditional TV viewing.
But increasingly, the most important platform is digital.
At one time, the way we interacted with the media was
through “appointment
journalism.” That is, we got the news when the media was ready to
deliver it.
Those days are gone. They have been completely disrupted and
disintermediated by the Internet and the Smartphone.
The media has also been impacted
by unbundling. For newspapers and magazines, the only economical way to
share news in the past was to package it into daily, weekly or monthly issues.
But people don’t want to wait until the media have enough
articles so it makes financial sense to release it; they want it now.
Or, as someone put it, don’t wait until tomorrow to tell me
what happened yesterday.
Today we want the news when we want it; we won’t wait until
the media says it is ready.
For the media, breaking away from these rhythms is hard. If
you spent your career working towards deadlines like the afternoon paper or the
supper hour news, these changes are tough.
But media consumers won’t have it any other way. For the
media, it is adapt or die.
As McGory of the Globe
put it, the goal is to be “more nimble, more innovative, and more inclined to
take worthwhile risk” in order to be a leader in sharing news.
Or just to stay alive.
No comments:
Post a Comment